What Did Jung Find in the Book of Job?

 In his book Transformation of the God-Image (1992), Edward Edinger summarized the Book of Job as follows: 

“There’s a wager in heaven between Satan and Yahweh as to whether or not Job can be turned away from God—kind of a heavenly conspiracy. Job is then beset with multiple calamities. Job then questions his situation: “Why is this happening to me?” He calls out to God to explain to him why this is happening, to justify to him the reason for it. He says he’s not an evil man and his life, his behavior, does not, in justice, warrant this kind of treatment. Counselors arrive on the scene who tell him, in effect, to quit questioning what’s beyond him and just submit and admit that though he may not understand it, God is just. But Job refuses. He perseveres in his questioning and in maintaining his integrity, as he puts it. And then finally, Yahweh manifests. He shows himself in the whirlwind and in his great final speech says, in effect, “Who are you to question me? Look at all my grandeur.” And with that, Job is silenced and accepts the situation. And Yahweh then restores all his property better than before. That’s the bare bones of the Biblical account.”1 (Edinger 1992, p. 28) 

Jung was struck by the core drama of the Book of Job which could be summed up as follows: after passing through a period of extreme turbulence, Job has a transcendent experience of God. To anyone who knows the life of C. G. Jung, some links are easy to make. In the story of Job, Jung found his own story, his own personal experience. Remember that in 1912 and 1913, Jung was in a period of psychological turbulence and depression2. He searched for a way out using his psychological knowledge of the human psyche and the techniques of psychoanalysis. 

He analyzed his childhood memories, events of his life, played with small stones and, out of despair, he let himself fall into the realm of imagination in order to find an answer to his problems. Then, in December 1913, he lived a transcendent experience that he narrated in The Red Book and to which he gave the title MYSTERIUM. In Memories, Dreams and Reflections, the experience is described as follows:

“I caught sight of two figures, an old man with a white beard and a beautiful young girl. I summoned up my courage and approached them as though they were real people, and listened attentively to what they told me. The old man explained that he was Elijah, and that gave me a shock. But the girl staggered me even more, for she called herself Salome! She was blind. What a strange couple: Salome and Elijah. But Elijah assured me that he and Salome had belonged together from all eternity, which completely astounded me… They had a black serpent living with them which displayed an unmistakable fondness for me. I stuck close to Elijah because he seemed to be the most reasonable of the three, and to have a clear intelligence. Of Salome was distinctly suspicious. Elijah and I had a long conversation which, however, I did not understand.” (MDR, p. 222)

That experience was a conjunction of two pairs of opposites symbols: Elijah and Salome (father and daughter in his vision) and Jung and the serpent (hero and anima). Those are the same symbols Jung used to describe the Self later in his writings. They are of the utmost importance to understand the individuation process and it is necessary to dive into Jung’s theory about those. 

In his book AION, researches into the phenomenology of the Self, Jung used the Moses quaternio of Gnosticism to show the opposites that appear in the transcendent experience. Those symbols are:

Moses is the hero, the conscious ego, Miriam, the anima or the unconscious. Jethro is the father and the sage and finally, Zipporah is the child, the pupil. Each one of these opposites has many correspondences which have the same symbolic meaning. In Jung’s narration of the Mysterium, those symbols are Jung as the hero, the black serpent as the anima, Elijah as the father and Salome as the daughter. According to Jung, those two pairs of opposites constitute the blueprint of the Self because their multiple correspondences always show the opposition me v. the world (Zipporah-Jethro) and consciousness v. unconscious (Moses-Myriam). According to Jung, the symbols of the Moses quaternio constitute the structure of the Self because they represent all opposites. 

The Self was, firstly, Jung’s hypothesis to explain transcendent experiences. As it contains all opposites, it expresses itself in consciousness as a conjunction of opposites. Because of their nature, opposites never merge in reality, they only do in transcendent experiences. 

According to Jung, mystical experiences are always a conjunctio oppositorum (conjunction of opposites) because when we decode the symbols appearing in them, we always find the two pairs of opposites of the Moses quaternio.

In AION, Jung stated that transcendent experiences are part of a series of three experiences in which each one is a precondition to the next. That statement comes from his study of the Gnostic texts and alchemy (Gerhard Dorn). In his opinion, those three experiences are part © Benoit Rousseau October 15, 2024 of the later stages of the individuation process and he linked them to a successful and consciously performed individuation.

Read More

Jung's Self explained - part 1

The psychoanalyst Fritz Perls objected that 'many psychologists like to write the self with a capital S, as if the self would be something precious, something extraordinarily valuable. They go at the discovery of the self like a treasure-digging. The self means nothing but this thing as it is defined by otherness'.

Well the Self is indeed a precious thing when we read Jung correctly.

In Wikipedia, under the Self we read

"Historically, the Self, according to Carl Jung, signifies the unification of consciousness and unconsciousness in a person, and representing the psyche as a whole.[2] It is realized as the product of individuation, which in his view is the process of integrating various aspects of one's personality. For Jung, the Self is an encompassing whole which acts as a container. It could be symbolized by a circle, a square, or a mandala."

This is a correct definition probably done by a Jungian interpreter but it lacks important aspects of the Self such as the "lived experience".

Jung's Self is, first and formost, his hypothesis to explain mystical experiences. The Self contains all opposites and manifests it self as a conjunction of opposites. And, as it has been already mentioned multiple times in previous posts, conjunction of opposites are mystical experiences in Jung's teachings.

In AION, Jung specifies (paragraph 303) that the Self is not a discovery, but a lived experience that occurs to man spontaneously. In a letter to Father Victor White, Jung wrote: 

“The opposites are united by a neutral or ambivalent bridge, a symbol expressing either side in such a way that they can function together” (C. G. Jung letters, vol.II, p. 166); and in a footnote “The bridge is the ‘uniting symbol,’ which represents psychic totality, the self” (p. 166, fn 11) 

In AION, Jung shows that Gnosticism and Alchemy were primarily concerned with mystical experiences. In the book, Jung uses the Moses quaternio from the Gnostics to explain the combination of opposites (complexio oppositorum) that appears in the mystical experience. 

Each one of those characters represent a family of symbols and Jung arranged them in two pairs of opposites.

Moses is the hero, the conscious ego, Miriam, the anima or the unconscious. Jethro is the father and the sage and finally, Zipporah is the child, the pupil. According to Jung, each character is an archetype and represents a family of symbols. Jung’s hypothesis is that a mystical experience is always a conjunction of those four archetypes which are two pairs of opposites. As a family of symbols, each one of these four characters may be declined with their correspondences. The symbols of the horizontal axis have many correspondences and the major ones are stated here:

              Parent                      Child

 = Father or Mother      Son or daughter 

= Grandparent              Child or grandchild

= Wiseman or Great Mother Apprentice-pupil 

 = Master Student 

 = Senex (old) Puer (young) 

 = World (God) Me 

 = Universe or Macrocosm Part or microcosm

= Totality Particle

That first pair of opposites represents the opposition particle-totality or me-universe. 

Psychological experience of these symbols shows that even if four archetypes are in conjunction during the first mystical experience, it is the conjunction of the symbols of the horizontal axis that is predominant. For Jung, it was his becoming the god AION and Christ in his first mystical experience. It is often described as an encounter with God, the light, Nature, the Universe, the Sage, the Great-Mother. 

An example of that experience can be found in the writings of Thomas Merton (1915–1968) where he recounts several peak experiences. His first experience took place in Rome when he was 18 years old. He was alone in his room at nightfall and, suddenly, he felt the presence of his father, who had died more than a year earlier. This presence was as vivid and real as if he had touched his arm or spoken to him. This sensation lasted only an instant, according to him. We recognize here the characteristics of the first mystical experience where the encounter between parent and child or the sage and the pupil is predominant.

Genevieve W. Foster (1902–1992) was a member of the Analytical Psychology Club of New York. She wrote the following account of her mystical experience:

"That is, I saw nothing unusual with my outward eye, but I nevertheless knew that there was someone else in the room with me. A few feet in front of me and a little to the left stood a numinous [i.e., divine] figure, and between us was an interchange, a flood, flowing both ways, of love. There were no words, no sound. There was light everywhere … Indoors and out, the world was flooded with light, the supernal light that so many of the mystics describe and a few of the poets.”

That is the lived experience of the Self. An extremely numinous symbol of conjunction of opposites that enters consciousness for a short moment.

Read More

The Philosopher's stone mystical experience and the REBIS

 To Jung, mystical experiences are symbols of conjunction of opposites that enter consciousness for a short moment. The philosopher's stone (lapis) of alchemy is the second mystical experience of the process, the small stone or albedo being the first. Jung was fond of the alchemist Gerhard Dorn because his system contained three successive conjunction of opposites or mystical experiences.

In Mysterium Conjunctionis, he wrote: 

“The production of the lapis was the goal of alchemy in general. Dorn was a significant exception, because for him this denoted only the completion of the second stage of conjunction. In this, he agrees with psychological experience. For us the representation of the idea of the self in actual and visible form is a mere rite d’entrée, as it were a propaedeutic action and mere anticipation of its realization.” (CW 14, par. 759)

That second mystical experience is often lived as a conjunction of spirit and matter where the outside world is experienced momentarily as being inside the psyche. In alchemy, this is the hieros gamos (sacred marriage) or the union of the King and the Queen where the King represents the spirit and the Queen, matter. Other names such as filius sol et luna (son of the sun and the moon) or filius philosophorum (son of the philosopher) are also alchemical terms that Jung used to talk about that second mystical experience. But above all, it is the philosopher’s stone or the stone which is not a stone, the lapis philosophorum (the stone of the philosopher). That experience is particularly rare because one must have lived the first experience to access the second one. In Jungian psychology terms, we would say that the shadow and the anima must be integrated to access the second mystical experience. 

In the illustrations of the alchemists, we often see the marriage of the king and the queen or the double thing (the rebis) made up of the male and female. The figure below is a good example. It is a symbolic description of the second mystical experience, in other words, the conjunction of spirit and matter. 

In this figure, the rebis surmounts the dragon which is always a symbol of the unconscious. It has two heads, one of a man and one of a woman (male and female). 

The rebis is a particularly strong  symbol of the experience of the Philosopher’s Stone because male and female, king and queen, sun and moon are all symbols of the conjunction of spirit and matter.

Other observations can be made. The four astrological symbols (Jupiter, Saturn, Venus and Mars) in the illustration are Jung’s four archetypes of the quaternio of Moses that appear in the mystical experience. The astrological sign of mercury is in a star that lies between the two heads of the rebis. Mercury is the god of revelation and represents the mystical experience itself. Finally, the sun (spirit) and the moon (matter), on either side of the head of the rebis, show the conjunction of spirit and matter. Note that the rebis is represented in the sky (spirit) and the round earth (matter) is under the dragon both sky and earth are in the oval shape that represents the experience. We should emphasize that the earth has wings and is therefore spiritualized, which means that matter is in spirit. This whole image symbolically illustrates the mystical experience of the philosopher’s stone using the conjunction of male and female, heaven and earth and sun and moon. These symbols and many others were alchemists’ way to illustrate the mystical experiences in the shade of the Inquisition. 

Accounts of the second mystical experience are difficult to find but two examples will follow. Thomas Merton’s second mystical experience happened in 1948, at the age of 33. He was in a commercial district at the corner of Fourth and Walnut Streets in Louisville. He says of this experience: 

“I was suddenly overwhelmed by the realization that I loved all these people, that they were me and I was them. We were not strangers to each other even though we didn’t know each other. It was like coming out of the dream of duality or the false sense of being alone.” 

Here, the characteristics of the second mystical experience appear. The non-duality, the unity of the world where everything is felt as part of oneself somewhat emerge. Forrest Reid (1875–1947) was a Northern Irish novelist and critic. He described his mystical experience as follows: 

“It was as if I had never realized before how lovely the world was. I lay down on my back in the warm, dry moss and listened to the skylark singing as it mounted up from the fields near the sea into the dark clear sky. No other music ever gave me the same pleasure as that passionately joyous singing. It was a kind of leaping, exultant ecstasy, a bright, flame-like sound, rejoicing in itself. And then a curious experience befell me. It was as if everything that had seemed to be external and around me were suddenly within me. The whole world seemed to be within me. It was within me that the trees waved their green branches, it was within me that the skylark was singing, it was within me that the hot sun shone, and that the shade was cool.”

Read More

Mystical Experiences in Alchemy

In Mysterium Conjunctionis, Jung wrote 

For thirty years I have studied these psychic processes under all possible conditions and have assured myself that the alchemists as well as the great philosophies of the East are referring to just such experiences, and that it is chiefly our ignorance of the psyche if these experiences appear “mystic.” (CW 14, § 762)

Carl Jung found in alchemy more than a prefiguration of his psychology. He found in it the means to write about mystical experiences almost freely. His numerous references to alchemy were his psychological explanations of the mystical experience phenomenon. Mystical experiences are extremely numinous symbols of conjunction of opposites that enter consciousness.

Jung writes: 

“The real subject of Hermetic philosophy is the coniunctio oppositorum. Alchemy characterizes its ‘child’ on the one hand as the stone (e.g., the carbuncle), and on the other hand as the homunculus, or the filius sapientiae or even the homo altus. This is precisely the figure we meet in the Apocalypse as the son of the sun-woman, whose birth story seems like a paraphrase of the birth of Christ—a paraphrase which was repeated in various forms by the alchemists. In fact, they posit their stone as a parallel to Christ.” (CW 11-I, par. 738) 

As we know, the Opus alchemicum normally consisted of four steps: nigredo, albedo, citrinitas and rubedo. Albedo corresponded to the first mystical experience also called the small stone and rubedo, to the second. The reason Jung was fond of Gerard Dorn is that the latter added a third conjunction in this process after the stone. Jung knew that the Stone was not the true final state of wholeness.

The goal of the rubedo phase is the Philosophical Stone. That mystical experience has a thousand names and Jung often used them. Whenever Jung used them, he was always talking about the conjunction of spirit and matter. Here are a few examples: lapis, rebis, filius philosophorum (son of the philosophers), filius solis et luna (son of the sun and the moon), the hermaphrodite, aurum non vulgi (non-vulgar gold), the green lion, aqua permanens, elixir, panacea, tincture, quintessence, living fount, the pearl, homo altus, pater mirabilis, salvator, filius macrocosmi, etc. 

Jung’s last major work Mysterium conjunctionis, the mystery of the conjunction, is devoted precisely to the study of mystical experiences in alchemy. Part VI is dedicated to Gerard Dorn’s model of the three conjunctions of opposites. The first conjunction is the unio mentalis, the union of the spirit and the soul. The second conjunction is known as the Philosopher’s Stone (lapis philosophorum) and consists of the conjunction of spirit and matter. From this second experience comes the integral man. The third conjunction is the rotundum and is a conjunction of the integral man with the unus mundus.

Jung considered that alchemists were projecting contents of the unconscious on their chemical experiences. The problem with that assertion is that every book on alchemy used different terms and different processes to achieve the supreme goal. Jung knew that fact. Therefore, the work of the alchemists could not have been real chemical experiences. It would be more appropriate to state that because those authors were the finest intellectuals of their time, they used the alchemical symbols to explain their mystical experiences and their personal processes in the achievement of the Philosopher’s stone. The alchemical lore was only a hermetic way to speak about mystical experiences in the shadow of the Church and the Inquisition. The gold, the precious stone and the treasure in the field are images of those experiences. 

We cannot be so far away from the truth when we read about the foreignness and obsoleteness of alchemy. Even though we are prone to think that the ancients were less intelligent than us, it was evidently not always the case. Unfortunately, Wolfgang Giegerich is one of those Jungian interpreters who have not shown any understanding of Jung 's use of alchemy in his psychology. Writing that being unsatisfied with clinical observation “Jung obviously needed to go away from immediate psychological experience, turn his back on psychology … in order to find something really other” (Giegerich, 2013, 372) is a flagrant misunderstanding of his psychology and alchemy. Carl Jung never stopped studying the human soul and psychological experiences were always at the center of his attention. Alchemy was the language he used as a physician to follow the rule « Primum non nocere », first do no harm to protect those who were not ready to understand him.

According to Jung, the lapis philosophorum or philosopher's stone is a signpost of the individuation process. As such,  it is the Self becoming conscious. In AION, Jung precised: 

“The “thousand names” of the lapis philosophorum correspond to the innumerable Gnostic designations for the Anthropos, which make it quite obvious what is meant: the greater, more comprehensive Man, that indescribable whole consisting of the sum of conscious and unconscious processes. This objective whole, the antithesis of the subjective ego-psyche, is what I have called the self, and this corresponds exactly to the idea of the Anthropos.” (CW 9ii, par. 296) 

To Jung, the lapis philosophorum as the precious stone of the philosopher is a mystical experience that changes one view of the world: 

“The alchemists sought for that effect which would heal not only the disharmonies of the physical world but the inner psychic conflict as well, the “affliction of the soul”; and they called this effect the lapis Philosophorum.” (CW 14, par. 674)

Read More

Jung's understanding of the Philosopher's stone

In the introduction to Jung's Black books, Sonu Shamdasani refers to a letter written by Jung to his wife while he was serving in the army in 1917 near Château d'Oex. In this letter dated June 27, he states: 

"Last night I had a remarkable mystical experience. A feeling of connection of several millennia. It was like a transfiguration." 

It is very likely that this is the second mystical experience Carl Jung reached, the first being linked to his active imagination called MYSTERIUM in The Red Book. Of the precise content of his experience, nothing published has been written by Jung. But the signs that it occurred do exist and they are numerous, both in his personal life and in his written work. 

That mystical experience changed the course of Jung's life, and he never stopped, afterward, talking about it or describing the steps to achieve it. You will probably think: where could he have talked about it if we know nothing about that mystical experience? He did so by using the alchemical terminology and the teachings of the Gnostics, both systems concerned with the phenomenon of mystical experiences. By his study of alchemical and Gnostic writings, Jung spoke to those who could understand him about the mystical experiences that he believed were induced by the individuation process.

In order to fully understand Jung's second mystical experience of 1917, it will be necessary to go through a few steps. Carl Jung spoke of mystical experiences or the conjunction of opposites in almost every one of his books, beginning in 1921 with The Psychological Types, where he used the terms uniting symbol, Pandora’s jewel, treasure in the lotus, symbol of union, the Grail, the divine service, the precious pearl and the treasure in the field in reference to the mystical experiences phenomenon. It was in AION, researches into the phenomenology of the Self (1951) that he explained thoroughly what he thought were experiences of the encounter with the archetype of the Self.

In AION, Jung used the Moses quaternio to talk about the combination of opposites that appears in mystical experiences. Those characters represent four families of symbols that are two pairs of opposites.  The first pair is

• Moses: the consciousness and the hero 
• Miriam: the unconscious and the anima 

The second pair is

• Jethro: the parent and the sage 
• Zipporah: the child and the pupil (CW 9ii, § 329) 

 The first experience is centered on the opposition parent-child or sage-pupil. It is the opposition of Jethro and Zipporah. It is lived as a numinous encounter with either God, the light, Nature, the universe, the Great Mother, the Sage, etc. It is always the conjuncion of the opposites particle-totality. 

The second mystical experience is better described with the symbols of the axis Moses-Myriam or ego-anima. It is experienced as if the whole world is in the psyche. The symbols of the second mystical experience, which is our principal interest here, have numerous correspondences which the most important or the most popular are: 

           Hero               Anima 

 =        King               Queen 

 =        Conscious      Unconscious 

 =        Ego                 Anima 

 =       Sun                 Moon 

 =       Spirit              Matter 

 Those symbols must be used to grasp the second mystical experience. That experience is described as a conjunction of spirit and matter (king and queen in alchemy) which they called the stone or lapis philosophorum. 

The conjunction of spirit and matter, as a mystical experience, is not easy to describe. It is lived as if the exterior world is in the psyche. This is an extremely numinous symbol of the conjunction of opposites. The best description that I have yet found is from Forrest Reid (1875–1947). He described his mystical experience as follows: 

“It was as if I had never realized before how lovely the world was. I lay down on my back in the warm, dry moss and listened to the skylark singing as it mounted up from the fields near the sea into the dark clear sky. No other music ever gave me the same pleasure as that passionately joyous singing. It was a kind of leaping, exultant ecstasy, a bright, flame-like sound, rejoicing in itself. And then a curious experience befell me. It was as if everything that had seemed to be external and around me were suddenly within me. The whole world seemed to be within me. It was within me that the trees waved their green branches, it was within me that the skylark was singing, it was within me that the hot sun shone, and that the shade was cool.”

In 1956, Jung published his last major work Mysterium conjunctionis, the mystery of the conjunction. This title is not insignificant. It is important to note that this important book is devoted precisely to the study of mystical experiences. In it, he talks about the three conjunctions of opposites or mystical experiences in alchemy. In the second volume, he refers extensively to the writings of a 16th century physician-alchemist, Gerhard Dorn. 

We need to state here that alchemy was not about the production of a material stone to achieve immortality or the process to change lead into gold. Those were symbols used by the alchemists to expose their method to reach mystical experiences in the shade of the Inquisition. Only ingenuous and naïve chemists tried to transform metals or produce the red stone. The authors of the alchemical texts were among the finest intellectuals of their generation and it silly to think that they literally meant what they wrote. The images they used in their grimoires were symbols of psychological processes and methods to achieve consciously mystical experiences. 

As we have said, Dorn’s system is composed of three conjunctions of opposites or mystical experiences. The first conjunction is unio mentalis, the union of the spirit and the soul. The second conjunction is known as the Philosopher's Stone (lapis philosophorum) and consists in the conjunction of spirit and body (interior-exterior). From this experience comes the unified or integral man. The third conjunction is the rotundum and is a conjunction of the integral man with the unus mundus. 

 It is said that the Philosopher’s stone has a thousand names and here are some to help us understand Jung: lapis philosophorum (stone of the philosopher), filius sol et lunae (son of sun and moon where sun is a symbol of spirit and moon, of matter), hieros gamos (sacred or chymical marriage of mind and body or spirit and matter), conjunctio sol et lunae (conjunction of the sun and the moon), homunculus, hermaphrodite, filius regius (royal son), cauda pavonis (peacock’s tail). In AION, Jung precised: 

“The “thousand names” of the lapis philosophorum correspond to the innumerable Gnostic designations for the Anthropos, whic Moh make it quite obvious what is meant: the greater, more comprehensive Man, that indescribable whole consisting of the sum of conscious and unconscious processes. This objective whole, the antithesis of the subjective ego-psyche, is what I have called the self, and this corresponds exactly to the idea of the Anthropos.” (CW 9ii, par. 296) 

To Jung, the lapis philosophorum as the precious stone of the philosopher is a mystical experience that changes one view of the world: 

“The alchemists sought for that effect which would heal not only the disharmonies of the physical world but the inner psychic conflict as well, the “affliction of the soul”; and they called this effect the lapis Philosophorum.” (CW 14, par. 674) 

As we have said earlier, the hieros gamos as the mystical marriage of the mind and body or spirit and matter is experienced momentarily as if the whole world is inside the psyche or “everything is in me”. Jung linked that experience to the individuation process: 

“Already in the sixteenth century, however, Gerard Dorn had recognized the psychological aspect of the chymical marriage and clearly understood it as what we today would call the individuation process.” (CW 14, par. 669)

Jung's extensive use of alchemy was his way to speak about mystical experiences to those who were able to read the second degree meaning of hos books. He always feares being tagged as a mystic. In response to Dr. Baur-Celio's question as to whether in the background of his works there was a secret knowledge, Jung replied on January 30, 1934: 

"I have made experiences that are in some way "unspeakable", "secret" since it is really not possible to express them and no one can understand them (I don't know if I myself have understood them, even approximately), "dangerous", insofar as 99 % of the human beings would declare me mad if they heard me speak about them, "catastrophic" insofar as the prejudice created by expressing them would risk blocking to the others the access to a living and marvelous secret, "taboo" because it is an adyton protected by the deisidaimonia . (...) Who would dare to speak of a creed... where he knows how much belief is superfluous when one does more than "know", when the experience has even tackled you to the wall? It is no longer a mere creed, but the greatest and most incisive experience of my life, that this door - a side door and very discreet - opens first onto a narrow path, unsuspecting and easily escaping attention - narrow and inconspicuous because few feet have trodden it - and yet it leads to the secret of transformation and renewal."¹

Read More

What is the Jungian Conjunction of Opposites (conjunctio oppositorum)?

Jung's transcendent function is exactly what its name implies: the psychological function that produces transcendent experiences. Those experiences are always symbols that express the conjunction of opposites. They appear for a short moment in consciousness with an extreme numinosity. As is well known and because of their nature, opposites never merge in the real world. When a symbol of conjunction of opposites appears in consciousness, it is always a very precise phenomenon that is called a mystical or transcendent experience. In Mysterium Conjunctionis, Jung wrote: 

“Experience shows that the union of antagonistic elements is an irrational occurrence which can fairly be described as ‘mystical,’ provided that one means by this an occurrence that cannot be reduced to anything else or regarded as in some way unauthentic.” (CW 14, par. 515)

Mystical or transcendent experiences have multiple names such as cosmic consciousness, enlightenment experience, oneness experience, samadhi, spiritual experience or unitive experience. Researchers in that field generally make no distinction between a spontaneous transcendent experience and a psychedelic experience but there is one important distinction: in the former one there is always a symbol of conjunction of opposites. Even if the feeling tone seems to be similar between the two types of experience, the symbol is the differentiation principle. For the purpose of our study, we will state a few qualities of the non-psychedelic transcendent experience: 

▪ the experience is extremely numinous; 

▪ the experience brings joy; 

▪ the experience is a lived symbol of conjunction of opposites; 

▪ the experience uses a symbol that is alive in the unconscious 

Carl Jung spoke of mystical experiences or conjunction of opposites in almost every one of his books because they were revised multiple times after their first publication. It was in AION, Researches Into the Phenomenology of the Self (1951) that he explained thoroughly those experiences he thought were irruptions of the archetype of the Self in consciousness. Jung’s Self is, first and foremost, his hypothesis to explain the mystical experience phenomenon. 

According to him, the Self contains all opposites and always manifest itself in consciousness as a conjunction of opposites. In AION, Jung specifies (paragraph 303) that the Self is not a discovery, but a lived experience that occurs to man spontaneously.

In a letter to Father Victor White, Jung wrote: 

“The opposites are united by a neutral or ambivalent bridge, a symbol expressing either side in such a way that they can function together” (C. G. Jung letters, vol.II, p. 166); 

and in a footnote “The bridge is the ‘uniting symbol,’ which represents psychic totality, the self” (p. 166, fn 11) 

In AION, Jung shows that Gnosticism and Alchemy were primarily concerned with mystical experiences. In the book, Jung uses the Moses quaternio from the Gnostics to explain the combination of opposites (complexio oppositorum) that appears in the mystical experience. 

Let’s see how the symbol of conjunction of those opposites appears in three examples of transcendent experiences. The first one comes from Nancy Clark (1941 –) who worked as a cancer researcher and cytology instructor at Ohio State University. She recalls her mystical experience: 

“I was addressing the audience with the eulogy, and I spoke perhaps three sentences when all of a sudden, I became aware of a brilliant white light coming from the left rear of the chapel at the ceiling. I did not see this light with my eyes, but, rather with some other unexplainable source. It was more of an “inner awareness.” I find it very difficult to describe. I could see but it was definitely not through my human eyes. 

Upon seeing this light, there was immediate recognition on my part that it was God. I felt I was in the presence of my creator, a very exhilarating, spiritual feeling. I can’t explain how I knew or how I recognized God’s presence. The best I can do is to say that there was a transference of knowledge placed directly into my consciousness. In other words, I was being fed the information that I was supposed to receive. 

The light completely surrounded me. I felt as if I had merged completely with the light and “belonged” to it. I felt a greater sense of reality and truth in this state. I felt as if I was “home.” The love that was emanating from the light is by far the most difficult aspect of my experience to relate to others. I feel so inadequate to speak of this love. Not because I am not a scholar, a theologian, a scientist, or someone who can dissect it and analyze it. I am limited simply by being human! It was not a human kind of love. It was not within the framework of our human experiences. Therefore, it defies human explanation. I can only say that it is because of this love that was channeled to me that I am able to remain strong and travel down life’s highway knowing that a great truth has occurred. 

I wanted to remain in the presence of this light forever! I felt as if I was in a state of grace. 

All my sins were forgiven, and I felt perfectly and totally FREE. If I had somehow been asked at that moment if I wanted to go with this light and leave my earthly life behind, I would not have hesitated and I would have chosen to go. Not because earthly life is so bad, but, rather, that’s how incredibly beautiful the light was.”¹

What appears in this description is the symbol of the conjunction of opposites me-light or me-God. It is a very numinous and somewhat indescribable experience. The spiritual light associated with God is a regular occurrence in transcendent experiences. In her description, the experiencer becomes surrounded with God and felt merged in his light. This is exactly the symbol of conjunction of opposites me-God of the transcendent experience. 

First mystical experiences always have at their core the symbol of conjunction of the opposites child-parent, me-God, me-universe or particle-totality. Thomas Merton’s first mystical experience bears the same symbols. It was the experience of the living presence of his, then deceased, father coming into his room near him and it carries the symbol of conjunction of opposites child-parent. 

John of the Cross had a similar first mystical experience, but the symbols were more religious because they were those that were alive in his psyche. He put his vision in a drawing that has reached us: 

The drawing shows Christ dying on the cross seen by his Father from above. The vision is the conjunction of opposites son-father, but it could also be interpreted as a symbol of John of the Cross taking the place of God watching his dying son. John of the Cross and God share the same view on the dying Christ as if John and God were one. It is a very powerful symbol that illustrate again the conjunction of opposites me-God.

Jung also had a similar mystical experience in December 1913. He recalls it in the 1925 Seminar on Analytical Psychology:

"Then I saw the snake approach me. She came close and began to encircle me and press me in her coils. The coils reached up to my heart. I realized as I struggled, that I had assumed the attitude of the Crucifixion. In the agony and the struggle, I sweated so profusely that the water flowed down on all sides of me. Then Salome rose, and she could see. While the snake was pressing me, I felt that my face had taken on the face of an animal of prey, a lion or a tiger. "(Introduction to Jungian Psychology P.104)

Here, we see the conjunction of the opposites me-God where the symbol of God take the form of the deus leonticephalus or the God Aion, the lion headed man with a snake coiled around him. But it is also the conjunction of the symbols me-Christ because he sees himself taking the posture of the crucifixion. Because Jung title this section of The Red Book MYSTERIUM, we can affirm that this experience was seen by him as mystical or transcendent.

In Mysterium Conjunctionis (1956), Jung wrote: 

“For thirty years I have studied these psychic processes under all possible conditions and have assured myself that the alchemists as well as the great philosophies of the East are referring to just such experiences, and that it is chiefly our ignorance of the psyche if these experiences appear ‘mystic.’” (CW 14, ¶ 762)

It was Jung's lifelong goal to research and explain transcendent experiences. His books become surprisingly clear when we assess this factor.

Read More

The Key to Understand Jung's AION

 

It was in AION that Jung explained thoroughly the Self as the subtitle of the book is Researches into the phenomenology of the Self. The first part of his book is devoted to prove his thesis, supported at length with numerous examples that the Self is a complexio oppositorum, e.g., a combination of two pairs of opposites. 

Every chapter makes the demonstration of that hypothesis under a different angle. That is why, for example, the symbol of the fish is double in astrology and that the symbol of Christ is counterbalanced by the symbol of the Antichrist. Since the fish and Christ could be seen as symbols of the Self, they necessarily consisted of two opposites. In the same way, Jung uses the symbol of the magnet which, as we know, contains a positive and a negative pole that are opposites. Let’s dive in his explanations. 

In paragraph 243 of AION, Jung introduces the symbol of the magnet and gives an abundance of synonyms and Latin expressions that state its qualities. Then, in paragraph 250, he lets us know that the magnet is a symbol of the Self. Referring to the Elenchos of Hippolytus (Refutation of the Gnostics by the early Christians), Jung mentions that the magnet appears three times in Gnostic writings: 

(1) In the doctrine of the Naassenes, the four rivers of paradise correspond to the four openings of the head: the eye, the ear, the nose and the mouth. The mouth is the opening where the food enters and from which the prayer comes out. It is from the mouth that the water of teaching (aqua doctrinae) comes. The latter is an alchemical term that corresponds more or less to the Self and therefore to the magnet. 

(2) In the theory of the Perates, no one can be saved without the Son. And they say that this Son (Christ) is the serpent. For the Perates, the serpent attracts iron (it is therefore a magnet and the Self). 

(3) Finally, for the Sethian doctrine, the magnetic attraction (magnet) comes from the spark, the ray of light, that is to say from the Logos (reason, thought, word and discrimination). 

In paragraph 293, Jung concludes on the three forms of the magnet or magnetic agent: 

• It is a passive substance: water. It is drawn from the bottom of the source. 

• It is an animated being: the snake or the serpent. It arises spontaneously or is discovered by surprise. It represents Christ.

• It is the Logos, an abstraction of the son of God (from the prologue of the gospel of John) and the power of thought or of speech. 

It is in paragraph 295 that Jung explains what is probably the most important sentence of AION: 

“All three symbols are phenomena of assimilation that are in themselves of a numinous nature and therefore have a certain degree of autonomy.” Knowing that autonomous phenomena are irruptions of unconscious contents into consciousness and that the archetype of the Self (identified here as the three forms of the magnet) appears in consciousness with a numinous glow like every other archetype, Jung is telling us, in that paragraph, that the water, the serpent and the Logos are three experiences of the Self or mystical experiences. 

Opposites never merge because of their nature. When opposites merge as a numinous symbol in consciousness, it is always a phenomenon that is called a mystical or transcendent experience. We should understand here that Jung linked those experiences to the Self.

Jung used the term phenomena (or phenomenon) of assimilation only eleven times in his Collected Works and he defines it as “the reaction of the psychic matrix, e.g., the unconscious, which becomes agitated and responds with archetypal images” (CW Addenda, § 1828). These phenomena, according to him, began with Gnosticism and continued through the Middle Ages and are still observed in modern times (addenda, § 1830). To Jung, mystical experiences are phenomena of assimilation because, for him, mystical experiences are irruptions of the archetype of the Self in consciousness.

In the next paragraph (296) of AION, Jung mentions: “This process revolutionizes the ego-oriented psyche, for it places beside it, or better, opposite it, another goal and center that is characterized by a multiplicity of names and symbols.” To Jung, mystical experiences, as phenomena of assimilation of the Self, are proof that the psyche is not just a conscious ego. There is a center and a goal in front of the ego and this center can manifest itself in consciousness three times. The Self is therefore Jung’s hypothesis to explain mystical experiences and it manifest itself autonomously according to certain conditions that he explains further. 

Jung continues (§ 303) and specify that the image of God, the imago dei (the Self) is not a discovery, but a lived experience that occurs to man spontaneously. It is this spontaneous experience, the mystical experience, that is the core subject of AION.

For more information

Carl 's AION Decoded

Read More

Was Jung wrong about the goal of alchemy?

 

The mercurial fountain is the heart of alchemy. This illustration is the depiction of the entire alchemical process. Let us begin by highlighting the most important components of this illustration. First, we notice four stars in the four corners of the image. Jung says that they represent the four elements: air, earth, fire and water. A basin is at the center of the scene. It is the vas hermeticum (hermetic vase), the place where the transformation is supposed to occur. 

The water pouring in the basin is known as the mare nostrum (our sea), the aqua permanens (permanent water) and the mare tenebrosum (dark sea) according to Jung. That water in the basin is identified as mercurius on the container which is the transformative substance of alchemy. Jung has often established a parallel between mercurius and the unconscious. 

The fountain has three faucets from which mercurius is identified as lac virginis, acetum fontis and aqua vitae which are all synonyms of the transformative substance mercurius. Above the fountain, we see the sun and the moon, representing the most hostile opposites, and a fifth star that represents the quintessence, the unity of the four elements. Finally, a dragon with two heads, the serpens bifidus, (mercurial serpent) represents the double nature of mercurius. 

In Psychology of Transference, Jung explains the alchemical process as follows:

« This structure reveals the tetrameria (fourfold nature) of the transforming process, already known to the Greeks. It begins with the four separate elements, the state of chaos, and ascends by degrees to the three manifestations of Mercurius in the inorganic, organic, and spiritual worlds; and, after attaining the form of Sol and Luna (i.e., the precious metals gold and silver, but also the radiance of the gods who can overcome the strife of the elements by love), it culminates in the one and indivisible (incorruptible, ethereal, eternal) nature of the anima, the quinta essentia, aqua permanens, tincture, or lapis philosophorum (philosopher’s stone)2. » (par. 404) So, according to Jung, alchemy starts from the psychological chaos and its fourfold nature. It is « the pluralistic state of the man who has not yet attained inner unity, hence the state of bondage and disunion, of disintegration, and of being torn in different directions » (par. 405). 

So, according to Jung, alchemy starts from the psychological chaos and its fourfold nature. It is « the pluralistic state of the man who has not yet attained inner unity, hence the state of bondage and disunion, of disintegration, and of being torn in different directions » (par. 405). From the chaos comes the state of the triad, the three manifestations of mercurius which are, in his opinion, the equivalent of desire, will and determination. The triad then transform itself in a dyad, sun (sol) and moon (luna) which « corresponds to the reaction of the psychic system as a whole to the impulse or decision of the conscious mind » (par. 406). The dyad is the representation of the complementary quality of the unconscious in relation to the conscious mind. Finally, the quintessence represents wholeness, the complete integration of the unconscious into consciousness. 

Jung’s interpretation of alchemy is based on an important fact that needs to be stated at the onset. He realized his two transcendent experiences while doing active imagination. This is the fundamental concept to his essay The Transcendent Function written in 1916 but only published in 1958. As you may know, active imagination is the process of identifying a feeling, letting it personify in imagination and interacting with it in a conversation. The Red Book, published in 2009, is primarily constituted with Jung’s active imaginations that he achieved from the late 1913. He wrote them down and he illuminated the text with his illustrations from 1915. 

So, when Jung speaks of the chaos being channeled into the three forms of mercurius, he is talking about the process of active imagination where the chaos is brought to order. Then, mercurius, the unconscious is canalized into a dyad, represented as sun and moon, the conscious and the unconscious. Following the complete integration of the shadow (personal unconscious) and the anima (collective unconscious), the quintessence appears as wholeness. 

With all due respect to Jungians who believe that Jung’s interpretations are the ultimate and indefectible reality, this explanation does not make sense and contains numerous errors. The most important are, first, the fact that mercurius, as the unconscious and its fourfold nature, cannot be explained by rational observations. Jung never explains why chaos is represented by the number four usually linked to totality and order. Second, Jung avoids to explain satisfactorily the threefold step of the alchemical process. What are the three faucets of the unconscious? Jung says that they are the inorganic, organic and spiritual worlds. We could understand that the unconscious coming from the spiritual world is its logic state, from the organic world probably means all the instincts but we are confronted with a problem: what is the inorganic world in humans and what is the unconscious that is canalized from the inorganic world? The response to that question does not exist. These two important mistakes, among others, indicates that Jung was wrong from the start in his interpretation of alchemy. 

So, what is the meaning of the mercurial foutain?

Let us begin by stating that the alchemists were not concerned about the unconscious but about consciousness. Mercurius, that is equivalent to the unconscious, in Jung’s interpretation is, in fact, a symbol of consciousness for the alchemists. The four elements appearing in the alchemical recipes are not symbols of chaos but of the four cognitive functions that Jung renamed after the four temperaments of the Greeks. We know from Jung and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, that humans develop only two functions: the dominant and the auxiliary functions. The latter being usually less developed than the dominant function.

As we have said above, the symbols appearing in the illustration state the process and the goal of alchemy. This goal was not about the integration of the unconscious but to identify and develop the four functions of consciousness. 

1. The first step of the process is to learn that consciousness has four directions (four elements or stars). 
2. The second step is to identify the function that is completely differentiated from the unconscious that we now call the dominant function but was identified mainly by mercurius by the alchemists. 
3. The third step is to determine the three functions that remain which are the three faucets of the mercurial fountain. Note that one of the faucets goes from right to left and represents the auxiliary function. The other two faucets flow from left to right and represent the two cognitive functions that need to be differentiated from the unconscious. The left side is usually related to the unconscious. 
4. The basin, as the vas hermeticum (hermetic vase), is the mind and the consciousness of the philosopher. 

Mercurius, as the transformative substance, is always consciousness. The ultimate goal of alchemy was to make consciousness flow from the three faucets and attain a state of complete consciousness. The sun and the moon as well as the dragon with two heads represent the two states of cognitive functions: part is completely developed and conscious (the dominant function = sun), part is undifferentiated or incompletely developed (the three other functions = moon). 

The double nature of mercurius, often stated in Jung’s writings, also shows those two states. 

Therefore, the illustration shows the alchemical process which was to retrieve wisdom (as consciousness) that was lost in matter or left unconscious (also the goal of the Gnostics). That wisdom or sofia is composed of the undifferentiated functions of consciousness. When the four cognitive functions are completely developed, the philosopher (alchemist) reaches the quintessence, the optimal consciousness with four operational functions of orientation of consciousness.

 Jung’s misinterpretation of alchemy can be explained. Although he thought that active imagination and the integration of the unconscious were the effective factors in his individuation, what was really functioning was not the integration of the unconscious but the development of the cognitive functions that were undifferentiated. In doing active imagination, he was identifying, night after night, feelings and emotions in order to interact with them in imagination. By doing that, he was in fact working on his introverted Feeling function and bringing it into consciousness. As an INTJ, Feeling was his tertiary function, a function that is usually undifferentiated. The next step into his individuation was not linked to the integration of the anima but to the elaboration of The Red Book. When in 1915, he started to write down his texts with gothic calligraphy and to illuminate his Red Book with meticulous illustrations, he was, in fact, working on his inferior Sensing function. The manual task around that book is, without a doubt, a Sensation process. Without knowing it, Jung did exactly what the alchemist taught in their grimoires: he developed his undifferentiated cognitive functions. He never realized that it was the development of the four functions of orientation of consciousness that were the active and operational factors in his individuation. Unfortunately, he based his whole psychology on the integration of the unconscious, misleading all his followers and disciples.

Read More

The secret of alchemy in a riddle from the 17th century

 In his book Sorcerer'stone, a beginner's guide ot alchemy, Dennis William Hauck quote a 17th century riddle about alchemy that says

“The key to life and death is everywhere to be found, but if you do not find it in your own house, you will find it nowhere. Yet, it is before everyone's eyes; no one can live without it; everyone has used it. The poor usually possess more of it than the rich; children play with it in the streets. The meek and uneducated esteem it highly, but the privileged and learned often throw it away. It is the only thing from which the Philosopher's Stone can be prepared, and without it, no noble metal can ever be created."

Hauck even writes that "if you really understand the answer, there is no need for you to read the rest of this book, for you are already an alchemist who has drunk from the Holy Grail of alchemy. Go out into the world now and accumulate as much of this substance as you can find, for it is the key to all transformations."

The secret to that riddle is no so difficult to find. Some will answer love, light, thought time or God but when you take each one of these answers they do not quite fit with the riddle.

Jungians would probably say that it is the unconscious or the soul but this is not quite exact either. The answer to that riddle is CONSCIOUSNESS which is the prima materia or the prime matter to prepare the philosopher's stone.

We know from Jung's research on psychological types and from the MBTI that humans generally develop only two cognitive functions and the other two are left undifferentiated. We sometimes see the emergence of the tertiary function in old people  but it never is as developed as the auxiliary cognitive funcion. The tertiary and the inferior functions are the complete opposites of the cognitive personality and are normally rejected as undesirable. The state of half consciousness is, therefore, nowadays lived as normal. 

It should be stressed that Jung did not invent the cognitive functions, he used the four temperaments of the Ancient Greeks, the four elements of astrology, the four cherubs of the Bible and rename them. Those are all the same complexio oppositorum or combination of two pairs of opposites. What Jung has added to them are the two directions of psychic energy: introversion and extraversion. 

In his 1925 Seminar on Analytical psychology, Jung defines the psychological state that leads to transcendent experiences or the transcendent function as the following: when one lower drastically the use of his auxiliary function for a sufficient period of time, the development of the tertiary function is automatically engaged. For example, if the use of the Feeling cognitive function is rejected, the opposite Thinking function will emerge to fill the gap in the rational or judgment capacity. 

When that third cognitive function reaches the level of automatic functioning, the mind produces a symbol of the conjunction of opposites. That is exacty what happened to Jung in 1913.

From 1911, when he was writing Symbols of Transformation, Jung was preoccupied with the opposition Thinking-Feeling. After his break with Freud, he felt in a depressive state, and he did an extensive auto-analysis to get out of this condition. When those Thinking type techniques did not produce results, he abandoned them and started working on his Feeling function. He then played with pebbles, constructing little houses and started doing active imagination. That provoked the lowering of his auxiliary Thinking function and the development of his tertiary Feeling cognitive function. This process ultimately produced a transcendent experience. This is what Jung called the sacrifice:

"A sacrifice must be done in order to cut the hero away from the power of the unconscious and give him his individual autonomy. He has to pay himself off and contrive to fill the vacuum left in the unconscious." (Introduction to Jungian Psychology P. 31) 

The sacrifice was in Jung’s case his Thinking cognitive function. In the Seminar, he recalled this dream that is a clear indicator of what is happening:

"Six days later (December 18, 1913), I had the following dream. I was with an unknown, brown-skinned man, a savage, I in a lonely, rocky mountain landscape. It was before dawn; the eastern sky was already bright, and the stars fading. Then I heard Siegfried's horn sounding over the mountains, and I knew that we had to kill him. We were armed with rifles and lay in wait for him on a narrow path over the rocks. Then Siegfried appeared high up on the crest of the mountain, in the first ray of the rising sun. On a chariot made of the bones of the dead he drove at furious speed down the precipitous slope. When he turned a corner, we shot at him, and he plunged down, struck dead. Filled with disgust and remorse for having destroyed something so great and beautiful, I turned to flee, impelled by the fear that the murder might be discovered. But a tremendous downfall of rain began, and I knew that it would wipe out all traces of the dead. I had escaped the danger of discovery; life could go on, but an unbearable feeling of guilt remained."

In his Seminar, Jung said that 

"It was a case of destroying the hero ideal of my efficiency. This has to be sacrificed in order that a new adaptation can be made; in short, it is connected with the sacrifice of the superior function in order to get at the libido necessary to activate the inferior functions. (P. 53) 

But it was not the superior cognitive function that Jung killed but his Thinking auxiliary one and it activated the development of his Feeling tertiary function. Jung was an INTJ and as such he had Intuition as his dominant function and Thinking as the auxiliary one. Without knowing exactly what to do to exit his sickness, he triggered the right buttons to reach his transcendent function. 

Conciousness is the answer to the riddle and the key to understand alchemy. 

Read More

The problem of participation mystique in the field of Jungian analytical psychology

The problem  of participation mystique is the cancer that is eating Analytical psychology.

Jung’s definition of participation mystique is: 

a term derived from Lévy-Bruhl. It denotes a peculiar kind of psychological connection with objects and consists in the fact that the subject cannot clearly distinguish himself from the object but is bound to it by a direct relationship which amounts to partial identity. (CW 6, ¶ 781). 

We could summarize participation mystique in that way: because the unconscious is always projected on the environment, we constantly live in our unconscious up until we integrate consciously our projections. Jungians should know about that psychological process because Jung was very clear about it. The integration of unconscious contents is the first obligation of any serious Jungian follower. 

Nevertheless, the Jungian literature of the last 60 years is immersed in the magical world of participation mystique or, should we say, the Jungian mystique. As an example, from thousands of other ones, Sonu Shamdasani who, as an historian and not a psychologist, could and should have been immune to this, felt too into the magical world of Jungian mystique. He underlined, in the introduction of The Red Book, twelve separate fantasies that Jung may have regarded as precognitive instead of linking them to his depression of which they all are a symbol. Why emphasize “precognition”, a phenomenon at the fringe of science, when basic Jungian interpretation is the best way to interpret those fantasies? The only answer is that Jungians love too much their Jungian mystique and they are unable to stick to science. They promote Jungian psychology as a science and they fall in the Jungian mystique at the first occasion. If Jungian analytical psychology were really a science, participation mystique would be seen as the principal enemy. 

Alchemy is probably the most popular medium for those who are lost in their participation mystique because it is full of magical images. At this time, there is no Jungian interpreters who wrote about alchemy that has understand why Jung used Alchemy and Gnosticism. If they did not link, in their writings, alchemy to mystical experiences, it is a clear indicator that they did not understand Jung at all. 

In their books and papers, those interpreters use inaccurately alchemical terminology as if by using Jung’s words they could enter his world and rise themselves to his level. They want to impress their readers with their supposed knowledge of alchemy but that kind of behavior, pretending we know what we do not, comes with a price: the danger of being, one day, disproved and ridiculed. To anyone who has carefully read Jung and his alchemical studies, there is no doubt that alchemy and Gnosticism were about mystical experiences. Jung used their terminology to speak about them because he spoke to those who would have the ability to understand him in the future. It is sad that nobody in the Jungian community seems to have figured out that opposites never merge in reality. Their conjunctions only occur in consciousness as a symbol during mystical experiences.

One of the best examples of the participation mystique problem of analytical psychology is this quote from Stanton Marlan’s book C. G. Jung and the Alchemical Imagination: 

“Like Jung, I find myself gripped by Jung’s story of his descent into the unconscious and his fateful encounter with alchemy. I find something infectious about this story. I have read it over and over again and identify with Jung’s experience as a symbolic ‘as if’, an inflation—part transference, part fetish, part participation mystique, and part poetic inspiration. What feels like an autonomous process draws me into a phantasmagoria of alchemical fiction, one has become an important part of my life and study.” 

Marlan's confession is one example out of numerous other authors who have let participation mystique win. What we find in this short quote is one of the major reasons why no one has yet been able to achieve Jung’s level of individuation. Too many Jungians know that they are the victim of a god-projection in relation to Jung, but they do nothing about it. They have abdicated their first duty to integrate unconscious contents. They prefer their magical world of fantasies over reality and over science. Their participation mystique is so important that they are not able to understand the psychological meaning of Jung’s writing and their scientific look on analytical psychology, if it ever existed, has become profoundly deficient.

Who is to blame for that lamentable state of Jungian psychology? The editors and the reviewers who are not doing their job properly. When those editors and the peer reviewers accept to publish something that leans toward the Jungian mystique instead of putting them aside, they do irreparable harm to the field of Analytical psychology. When a "scientific" Jungian journal publishes in the same number articles, essays and poetry, their editorial board have sacrificed their scientific responsibility and have brought back their review to the state of a high school journal. The peer review system is broken in Analytical psychology and there is no way out unless a few people wake up and start to give science its letters of nobility.

Jung wrote, in a private letter to Eugene Rolfe in 1960, a few months before his death: 

“I had to understand that I was unable to make the people see what I am after. I am practically alone. There are a few who understand this and that, but almost nobody sees the whole. (…) I have failed in my foremost task, to open people’s eyes to the fact that man has a soul and there is a buried treasure in the field, and that our religion and philosophy are in a lamentable state.”

Jung was very magnanimous to take that responsibility unto his shoulders but we must consider here that Jung was not the only one responsible for that problem, his followers and interpreters also were and still are.

For more,

https://www.academia.edu/118156064/Carl_Jungs_Gnosis_Mystical_Experiences_as_Signposts_of_the_Individuation_Process

Read More

Is Wolfgang Giegerich Wrong about Alchemy?

 In order to answer that question, we need to state certain facts about Jungian texts.

What did Jung find in Alchemy and Gnosticism that helped him explain mystical experiences? In AION, Jung’s whole demonstration is based on the Moses quaternio of the Gnostics which is the cross-cousin marriage diagram that Jung used frequently in his books. This complexio oppositorum (combination of opposites) is, according to him, the fundamental structure of the Self because it contains all opposites.

Moses is the hero, the conscious ego, Miriam, the anima or the unconscious. Jethro is the father and the sage and finally, Zipporah is the child, the pupil. According to Jung, each character is an archetype and represents a family of symbols. Jung’s hypothesis is that a mystical experience is always a conjunction of one pair of those opposites. As a family of symbols, each one of these four characters may be declined with their correspondences. To Jung, mystical experiences were extremely numinous symbols of conjunction of opposites that enter consciousness forma brief moment. The first mystical experience always is a conjunction of the symbols of the horizontal axis. The relation between the child and the parent could be seen as the opposition particle-whole, me-universe or me-God. As such, the first transcendent experience has a symbol of the encounter or a merging between the opposites me-God, me-universe or me-sage considering that these symbols have multiple correspondences of equal value.

An example of that experience can be found in the writings of Thomas Merton (1915–1968) where he recounts several mystical experiences. His first experience took place in Rome when he was 18 years old. He was alone in his room at nightfall and, suddenly, he felt the presence of his father, who had died more than a year earlier. This presence was as vivid and real as if he had touched his arm or spoken to him. This sensation lasted only an instant, according to him. We recognize here the characteristics of the first mystical experience where the conjunction of opposites parent and child or sage and pupil forms a numinous symbol.

Genevieve W. Foster (1902–1992) was a member of the Analytical Psychology Club of New York. She wrote the following account of her mystical experience:

“That is, I saw nothing unusual with my outward eye, but I nevertheless knew that there was someone else in the room with me. A few feet in front of me and a little to the left stood a numinous [i.e., divine] figure, and between us was an interchange, a flood, flowing both ways, of love. There were no words, no sound. There was light everywhere … Indoors and out, the world was flooded with light, the supernal light that so many of the mystics describe and a few of the poets.”¹

 

Jung's findings in Gnosticism and alchemy support his basic hypothesis that mystical experiences are signposts of the individuation process because they are the irruption of the archetype of the Self in consciousness. The Self containing all opposites always manifests itself as a conjunction if opposites.

When one understand these premisses, one has the key to read Jung because he becomes surprisingly clear. When Jung uses alchemical or gnostic terminology, he is always writing about mystical experiences and the process to reach them.

That leads us to the question about Wolfgang Giegerich. His analysis of Jung’s relation to alchemy is fondamentally baseless and it shows how a superficial knowledge of alchemy and of Jungian thought always produce wrongful evaluations. He wrote: 

“Instead of realizing that alchemy was an implicit and naïve, indeed to a large extent, helplessly groping form of thought, JUNG most of the time mistook it as an implicit psychology (in the personalistic sense of ‘people’s psychology,’ having to do with one’s self-development), thereby depriving himself of the possibility to realize that the object of psychology proper (the life of the soul) is logical life and that the redemption of the seemingly miscarried alchemical undertaking had taken place, more than a century prior to JUNG, in Hegel’s dialectical logic.”²

Now, who is naïve and mistaken here? Giegerich himself. He projects on Jung his own errors of judgment, his unconsciousness. When someone takes the chance to question Jung’s evaluation of alchemy, he first needs to do his homework and figure out what alchemy was really about. Giegerich shows no sign, in his writings, that he understands that alchemy was, in fact, an implicit psychology to explain and reach mystical experiences. He misread Jung and stayed at the inferior level of those who think that alchemy was a mishmash of absurdities. In contrast, Jung saw from the start that alchemy was a system to reach both wholeness and mystical experiences because he deciphered its symbols correctly. Giegerich failed to understand Jung properly in that domain and that cast a shadow on his entire work. By writing this, he tried to elevate himself over Jung but he just proved that he was not up to the job. That is what the intellectual inadequacy looks like nowadays.

Alchemical texts were written by the most brillant minds of their time. It is silly to think that their recipes were naïve techniques to produce gold. The most logical explanation of alchemy is that the grimoires contained a specific knowledge that needed to be hidden from the Church and the Inquisition. The gold or the philosophical stone are symbols of a transcendent experience. When we look at historical figures we tend to see them as inferior to us but this is not always the case. Those intellectual scholars, Newton, Paraclesus, Dorn, ... knew what they were talking about. Their goal was to explain the secret knowledge about mystical experiences and Jung was able to decipher their symbols.

Giegerich's defective evaluation represents the foremost problem in Analytical psychology today: the incapacity to arrive at simple conclusions about Jung's writings.

Fore more see

An alchemical riddle

Jung's alchemy

Read More

Is Jungian Psychology at a dead end?

Yes and there are muliple reasons for that state.

First, Jungian interpreters are generally certified analysts and psychologists. They are extremely competent in their use and knowledge of the therapeutic aspects of Jungian Psychology but they seem unable to understand Jung's most difficult books. None of them has been able to explain Jung's book Aion, researches into the phenomenology of the Self. They are therefore ill-equipped to explain the most important characteristic of the Self as a lived conscious experience.

Second, Jung surrounded himself from the 1920 with a group of people that were well under his intellectual level. As they became the first generation of Jungian analysts, they were unable to understand the most difficult aspects of his psychology and they did not ask Jung clarifications about those subjects. That first generation of analysts trained the next generation and that knowledge was forever lost. 

Third, Jungian interpreters seem unable to draw a direct conclusion from the chain of events in Jung's journey. When one put in line those important facts, one finds the key to understand his psychology. Those facts are:

1.  Jung classified The Seven Sermons to the Dead written in 1916  as JU 0 in his personal library. That means that he ranked it as his first publication which is significant. That book is not chronologically the first one he has written. The Psycholgy of Dementia Praecox (1907) and Symbols of Transformation (1912) were published before the Sermons. This indicates that something happened after the publishing of Symbols of Transformation (1912) that pushed him to consider that the Sermons was his first writing of importance.

2. The essay The Transcendent Function was written in 1916 but was not published until some students from the C. G. Institute of Zurich found it in 1957. The fact that this essay was left unpublished for so long is definitely a clue worth considering. When one puts together all the mentions of the transcendent function in Jung's books, one understands that the function is litterallt what its title infers: the psychological function that produces a transcendent or mystical experience.

3. He titled his december 1913 active imagination experience of becoming the god Aion or deus leonticephalus MYSTERIUM. It is a clear indicator that he considered it as a transcendent experience. The title of the 1951 book AION is a clear reference to that experience that he also called a phenomenon of assimilation of the Self as well as his 1955 book Mysterium Conjunctionis (the mystery of the conjunction).

4. His interest for the opposites and their conjunctions. Jung understood early that mystical experiences are symbols of conjunction of opposites that enter consciousness with an extreme numinosity. Often reported experiences are the conjunction of me-God and me-universe.

5. His interest in gnosticism and gnosis. Jung found in gnostic tests the first reference to mystical experiences. In his book AION, he underlines the use by the Gnostics of the magnet as a symbol of transcendent experiences (the magnet being a conjunction of opposite poles).

6. His interest in the book The Secret of the Golden Flower that sparked his interest about alchemy.  Jung found in that book the description of a mystical experience.

7. His extensive researches in alchemy. Jung found in alchemy the aurea catena or golden chain of secret knowledge about transcendent experiences. Alchemy offered him a tool to talk about those experiences without being tagged as a mystic. Thus, he chose to speak only to those who would be able to understand the second degree meaning of his studies.

Read More

Carl Jung's first mystical experience

 In his Seminar on Analytical Psychology given in 1925, Jung talked about his first mystical experience. In The Red Book, he called the section where he described his experience MYSTERIUM, which is a clear indicator of the mystical aspect of that experience. In the Seminar, he recalled: 

The next thing that happened to me was another fantastic vision. I used the same technique of the descent, but this time I went much deeper. The first time I should say I reached a depth of about one thousand feet, but this time it was a cosmic depth. It was like going to the moon, or like the feeling of a descent into empty space. First the picture was of a crater, or a ring-chain of mountains, and my feeling association was that of one dead, as if oneself were a victim. It was the mood of the land of the hereafter. 

I could see two people, an old man with a white beard and a young girl who was very beautiful. I assumed them to be real and listened to what they were saying. The old man said he was Elijah and I was quite shocked, but she was even more upsetting because she was Salome. I said to myself that there was a queer mixture: Salome and Elijah, but Elijah assured me that he and Salome had been together since eternity. This also upset me. With them was a black snake who had an affinity for me. I stuck to Elijah as being the most reasonable of the lot, for he seemed to have a mind. I was exceedingly doubtful about Salome. We had a long conversation then but I did not understand it.

The appearance of the two symbols sage-pupil (Elijah and Salome) was for Jung the two symbols of the tension of opposites alive in his psyche. They correspond to what he was confronted in 1912-1913: the split with Freud and with Sabrina Spielrein. That was the tension of opposites he endured for many months. He explains: 

Elijah and Salome are together because they are pairs of opposites. Elijah is an important figure in man’s unconscious, not in woman’s. He is the man with prestige, the man with a low threshold of consciousness or with remarkable intuition. In higher society he would be the wise man; compare Lao-tse. He has the ability to get into touch with archetypes. He will be surrounded with mana, and will arouse other men because he touches the archetypes in others. He is fascinating and has a thrill about him. He is the wise man, the medicine man, the mana man. Later on in evolution, this wise man becomes a spiritual image, a god, “the old one from the mountains” (compare Moses coming down from the mountain as lawgiver), the sorcerer of the tribe. He is the legislator. (Introduction to Jungian Psychology P.101)

The mystical experience is always a symbol of conjunction of opposites that seizes consciousness. In his experience, Jung becomes the god Aion andm at the same time, Christ. The conjunction of the symbols God-me or universe-me is frequent. He recalled: 

Then I saw the snake approach me. She came close and began to encircle me and press me in her coils. The coils reached up to my heart. I realized as I struggled, that I had assumed the attitude of the Crucifixion. In the agony and the struggle, I sweated so profusely that the water flowed down on all sides of me. Then Salome rose, and she could see. While the snake was pressing me, I felt that my face had taken on the face of an animal of prey, a lion or a tiger. (Introduction to Jungian Psychology P.104) 

 The serpent that encircles him, the posture of the crucifixion, the sweat flowing on his skin, the pressure of the snake, the face becoming that of a lion, etc. are all expressions of the Sensation cognitive function which was Jung’s inferior function. The inferior cognitive function is known to be the gateway of the unconscious. In the same Seminar, he added: 

The animal face which I felt mine transformed into was the famous [Deus] Leontocephalus of the Mithraic mysteries, the figure which is represented with a snake coiled around the man, the snake’s head resting on the man’s head, and the face of the man that of a lion. (Introduction to Jungian Psychology P.106)

Jung describes the god Aion or deus leonticephalus as:

The lion-headed god encoiled by the snake was called Aion, or the eternal being. He derives from a Persian deity, Zrwanakarana, which word means “the infinitely long duration.” Another very interesting symbol in this cult is the Mithraic amphora with flame arising from it, and the lion on one side with the snake on the other, both trying to get at the fire. The lion is the young, hot, dry July sun in culmination of light, the summer. The serpent is humidity, darkness, the earth, winter. They are the opposites of the world trying to come together with the reconciling symbol between them. It is the famous symbolism of the vessel, a symbolism that survives till 1925—see Parsifal. It is the Holy Grail, called the Vase of Sin (see King: The Gnostics and Their Remains17). Also, it is a symbol of the early Gnostics. It is of course a man’s symbol, a symbol of the womb—the creative womb of the man out of which rises the fire. When the pairs of opposites come together, something divine happens, and then it is immortality, the eternal, creative time. Wherever there is generation there is time, therefore Chronos is God of Time, Fire, and Light. (Introduction to Jungian Psychology P.107)

When Jung states, in his seminar, that the symbols of the deus leontocephalus are related to something divine which express immortality, we must understand that he is emphasizing that the symbol of the conjunction of opposites that appeared in his consciousness was a numinous mystical experience, a transcendent experience. It is clear that Aion was Jung’s symbol of conjunction of opposites in his first transcendent experience.

For more on this subject, please read

https://www.academia.edu/126270799/Carl_Jungs_Transcendent_Function_his_Insight_into_Mystical_Experiences_2024f_

Read More

Jung's transcendent function is exactly what it means

 Carl Jung wrote the essay The Transcendent Function in 1916, but it was not published until 1958 when students at the C. G. Jung Institute of Zurich discovered it. The psychological phenomenon explained by Jung in his essay comes before the most important concepts of his psychology such as archetypes, shadow, anima/animus and Self. 

As a result, it is of the utmost importance to understand Jung’s individuation process. 

Nevertheless, the transcendent function is probably the most misunderstood notion in the field of Analytical psychology. Jungians generally explain it as a mere product of the integration of unconscious contents in consciousness, but they miss the essence of its description by Jung as the autonomous compensation from the archetype of the Self and the voice of God. 

The transcendent function is exactly what Jung implied in the title of his essay: the psychological process to produce a mystical or transcendent experience. To Jung, that phenomenon is an extremely numinous symbol of conjunction of opposites entering consciousness for a short moment. Jung’s 1916 essay was his first attempt to explain psychologically his mystical experience of December 1913. 

In his multiple descriptions of that function, Jung describes it as a purely natural process but, at the same time, a grace, the will of God and the voice of God, it comes from the conflict of opposites as a creative solution, it is a spontaneous compensation by the unconscious, a living symbol that unites opposites, the experience of an autonomous archetype that change the personality in an indescribable way and leads to the revelation of the essential man, the Self, the original wholeness. That sums up as the description of a mystical experience and its outcome. In fact, all signs lead to the conclusion that the transcendent function produces a transcendent experience, and we should consider that those experiences are at the center of Jung’s Analytical psychology. We must also underline that the expression “mystical experience” is mentioned 673 times in Jung’s collected works and it is certainly one important indicator that the subject is of the utmost importance in his psychology.

For more on that subject, please read

https://www.academia.edu/126270799/Carl_Jungs_Transcendent_Function_his_Insight_into_Mystical_Experiences_2024f_

Read More